The Atlantic pulls Scientology ads after outcry

I saw this article last night during the Twitter outcry. What was this esteemed publication doing with this blatantly obvious “advertorial”?

It has since been pulled.

Poynter. » The Atlantic publishes then pulls sponsored content from Church of Scientology.

About 11 hours after it was published online, The Atlantic removed sponsored content from the Church of Scientology.

Journalists had raised questions about how comments on the sponsored content were moderated, compared to how comments are moderated on other Atlantic content.

Atlantic spokesperson Natalie Raabe tells The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple, “Our marketing team was monitoring some of the comments,” which has triggered the need to review that process.

The sponsored page carried a Scientology banner ad across the top and linked to two stories on the Scientology website.

Sponsored content — or “native advertising” — is produced by the news organization to look and feel like the site’s own editorial work; it has becoming increasingly appealing to several news organizations, including The Atlantic and BuzzFeed.

atlanticscientology

It looked like a normal article unless you noticed the yellow box that said “sponsored content”. Advertisements made to look like real articles are typical online and in print. Sometimes, you don’t even realize. I didn’t realize until I saw NOTHING but promotional pictures and text. Then the comments! The headline was Scientology had “milestone year”. Indeed they did but it wasn’t good, it was horrendous.

One has to be VERY cautious and SKEPTICAL of news content these days. They are trying to pull a fast one on you. Sneaky.

Tony Ortega, whose blog focuses on Scientology issues, has more:

UPDATE 11:45 PM: THE ATLANTIC JUST REMOVED THE SCIENTOLOGY ADVERTORIAL IN THE FACE OF MOUNTING RIDICULE. THEY POSTED THIS NOTICE:

“We have temporarily suspended this advertising campaign pending a review of our policies that govern sponsor content and subsequent comment threads.”

He preserved the piece and the comments so head on over there to see them. He notes that the church is giving very large numbers of members that can’t be justified. They are desperate for some positive PR.

UPDATE: (17-Jan-2013) This is

Comments are tightly moderated. Please follow the Comment Policy.
This is not a forum or free-for-all. Only thoughtful additions and pertinent opinions will be approved.